FYI, Arnold ... might be worth talking to Ari
--
Arnold Nipper, Member of the SwissIX Board
email: arnold.nipper(a)swissix.ch
mobile: +49 172 2650958
URL: https://www.swissix.ch/association/board
Hi Guys
As agreed I would share what the LINX’s Juniper SE shared with me with regards to RFC8950.
Hope this is useful info.
Mo
Hi Mo,
Hope you’re well.
We support RFC5549 (predecessor to RFC8950) on MX since 17.3R1. Other platforms like QFX had support added later as per below:
https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/feature-info.html?fKey=7931&fn=Re…
Below are some PRs that affected RFC8950 compliance:
PR1649332<https://prsearch.juniper.net/problemreport/PR1649332> : RFC 8950 Extended Nexthop Encoding Capability conformance issue
PR1716946<https://prsearch.juniper.net/problemreport/PR1716946> : BGP connection doesn't establish when it is configured with rfc8950-compliant under logical-systems on all Junos and Junos OS Evolved platforms
From the last PR, the fixes are available in:
22.4R2
22.4R3
23.1R2
23.2R1
23.3R1
Reference documentation:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/topic…
For point to point BGP peering, the dynamic tunnels described in above doc are not required.
I tested on 23.1R2 and below is my simple topology and sample config:
LAN01(2.2.2.0/24) ------- ge-0/0/2 - R1 (AS65001) - ge-0/0/1---- v6 Peering ---- ge-0/0/1 R2 (AS65002) ge-0/0/2 ------- LAN02 (1.1.1.0/24)
root> show configuration protocols bgp
group TEST {
type external;
local-address 2001:db8::2;
family inet {
unicast {
extended-nexthop;
}
}
export EXPORT-BGP;
peer-as 65001;
neighbor 2001:db8::1;
}
rfc8950-compliant;
root> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/1
unit 0 {
family inet;
family inet6 {
address 2001:db8::2/64;
}
}
root> show route table inet.0 1.1.1.0/24
inet.0: 6 destinations, 6 routes (6 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
1.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 14:18:30, localpref 100
AS path: 65001 I, validation-state: unverified
> to 2001:db8::1 via ge-0/0/1.0
Please let me know if you would like to have a quick call to go through.
Kind Regards,
Ashvin
Juniper Business Use Only
Hi all,
while requesting lab resources to test RFC8950 with our Nokia boxes, a
colleague hinted me at Containerlabs <https://containerlab.dev/>.
It appears to be a nice solution for testing vendor interoperability
with regard to RFC8950. One can instantiate containers running network
operating systems from various vendors and can easily configure their
topology.
However, I have no experience with that software so far. Is anyone of
you familiar with it and can estimate how well we could make use of it
for our purposes?
Best regards,
Daniel W.
--
Daniel Wagner
Researcher
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany)
phone: +49 69 1730 902 630
mobile: +49 151 5530 4818
e-mail:daniel.wagner@de-cix.net
web:www.de-cix.net
------------------------------
DE-CIX Management GmbH
Executive Directors: Harald A. Summa and Sebastian Seifert
Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135
Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne
Hi,
We had a meeting on zoom earlier this week, and I forgot to post the
meeting notes on the mailing list, so here goes. The next meeting is
October 17th.
https://github.com/euro-ix/rfc8950-ixp/wiki/19%E2%80%9009%E2%80%902023-Notes
Chair: Axu
Attendees: Bijal, Marta, MoShiv, Maria, Daniel
1. Recap
2. Action Points
* Daniel: Test setting up IPv6 next hops for IPv4 routes on Nokia SROS
* Daniel: Test what traceroute looks like on Nokia with RFC8950
* Axu: Write up check list that can be used to test RFC8950 in IXP
lab environment.
* Maria: Add automated tests in Bird2 for RFC8950
* Mo: Test setting up IPv6 next hops for IPv4 routes on ExBGP
* Mo: Test what traceroute looks like on Nokia with RFC8950
As to my own action point above, I started compiling the checklist in
the examples directory README.md on github:
https://github.com/euro-ix/rfc8950-ixp/blob/main/examples/README.md
Kindest Regards,
--
+358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/
Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy
You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
Hi,
Excerpt from https://mattermost.nog.fi/euro-ix-forum/channels/rfc8950-wg
Bijal: 17:41
Hi everyone, i know some of you are on holidays at the moment but could
we schedule a meeting for either 8th August or 22nd August 12:00 UTC /
13:00 BST / 14:00 CEST to get things going? Can you let me know your
preference and we'll go with the majority. Thanks!
Axu_TREX: 09:35
https://strawpoll.com/7rnzmpQqDyO
Bijal: 15:17
...Or @Axu_TREX can send a poll :slightly_smiling_face:
--
+358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/
Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy
You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."
